Predicting NFL teams most likely to improve in 2026 season

play
How Chiefs' defense can help them bounce back this season (1:06)

Even by NFL standards, 2025 was a topsy-turvy season. Seven teams saw their records improve or decline by at least six wins, the most in any campaign since 2008. And though that's a little more feasible in a 17-game season than it was in the 16-game era, the 10-game improvement by the Patriots, who improved from 4-13 to 14-3, was the largest by any team since 1999, when the Colts pulled that off in Peyton Manning's second season.

Teams hoping to emulate the Patriots might find a difficult path forward. The Pats made a major coaching upgrade by hiring Mike Vrabel, who had been one of the league's best coaches during his time with the Titans before losing a power struggle in Nashville. New England relied as heavily on free agency as any team in recent memory, with 13 of its 25 most-used players on offense and defense acquired as free agents over the previous two offseasons. And the Patriots notably had what was one of the easiest schedules in league history, facing just two teams that posted a winning record all season.

The Patriots' path toward the Super Bowl was off my radar, and they weren't included in my annual look at teams most likely to improve at this time last year. The other six teams to jump by at least six wins, though, are all featured in one of the two columns you'll see this week. Today, we start on the rosy side and focus on the teams that are most likely to improve in 2026. And on Tuesday, we'll talk about the ones that are most likely to decline.

Subscribe: 'The Bill Barnwell Show'

Last year's column featured the Raiders, who declined by a game, and the Giants, who improved by one win. The other three teams were much bigger successes. The Bears rode the Ben Johnson effect and a flood of takeaways on defense to an 11-6 mark after going from 5-11 in 2024. The 49ers jumped from 6-11 to 12-5. And the Jaguars made the biggest leap, going from 4-13 to 13-4 in Liam Coen's first season at the helm. All three teams made the playoffs after finishing well below .500 the previous season.

Since 2017, this annual column has gone 35-8 (.813) in picking teams to improve on the previous season's record. The average team has gotten 3½ games better after adjusting for the 17-game schedule. And if we include our picks for teams that will decline, the back-to-back columns are a combined 69-17 (.802) in accuracy, while going 50-36 (.581) against the preseason over-under totals preserved on Pro-Football-Reference.com.

So, recent history suggests four of the five teams listed in this year's column should get better. There's a fun mix of teams that just took a step back in 2025 and long-frustrating organizations that might exceed expectations in 2026. Let's start with the headliners from last year's decline column who might be the most obvious pick of the bunch ...

Note: Schedule strength is via ESPN's Football Power Index (FPI).

Jump to:
BAL | DET | KC | NYG | NYJ

Kansas City Chiefs

Record in 2025: 6-11 (1-9 in games decided by seven or fewer points)
Point differential in 2025: plus-34
Projected strength of schedule: 14th easiest

You could have suspected things would start here. Twelve months ago, the Chiefs were coming off a 15-2 regular season and led my column on teams most likely to decline in 2025. Andy Reid's squad had gone 10-0 in games decided by seven points or fewer in 2024, an NFL record. And though anyone who has read this column annually is already familiar with the idea that teams struggle to win a significant proportion of their close games year after year, I wouldn't have blamed anyone who believed the Chiefs were an outlier.

The 10-0 mark took Patrick Mahomes to 43-17 in one-score contests. We've seen other generational quarterbacks -- with Tom Brady as a notable example -- win more of their one-score games than you might expect. It would have been foolish to count on the Chiefs to win every one of their one-score games again, but expecting Mahomes and the Chiefs to fall to even .500 in close games also seemed to be a bad bet.

Then, the Chiefs started their 2025 season with a six-point loss to the Chargers. Kansas City lost by three to the Eagles in Week 2. The Jags' late charge led to a Chiefs loss in Week 5. They were winning big, but when things were close, a team that had always found a way to win the close ones in 2024 found ways to lose them in 2025. The Chiefs went from 10-0 to 1-9 in one-score games between 2024 and 2025, including a 1-7 record with Mahomes under center before the star quarterback tore his left ACL.

As you probably guessed, the 18-game swing between 2024 and 2025 is the biggest of one-score victories in league history. The previous record was 13 games by the 2022-23 Vikings, who fell from 9-0 to 4-8 in one-score games. Minnesota then followed with an 8-1 mark in 2024 before regressing to the mean and landing at 4-3 in 2025.

The Vikings were cycling through quarterbacks for most of that time, though, and the Chiefs had Mahomes for most of last season. Most of the stars who helped the Chiefs to three consecutive Super Bowl appearances were back in 2025, too. And though the Chiefs were down to third-stringers at QB and left tackle by the end of the season, they were about average in terms of season-long health on offense and even had the league's healthiest defense, per the FTN Football Almanac's adjusted games lost metric.

Did the Chiefs just play significantly worse? By advanced metrics, the answer to that question is ... not really. The 2024 Chiefs finished the regular season eighth in DVOA, pointing to a good team that had remarkable luck in one-score games. And though the 2025 Chiefs understandably faded after Mahomes gave way to Gardner Minshew II and Chris Oladokun at quarterback, they ranked eighth in DVOA through the game against the Chargers in Week 15, when Mahomes suffered his ACL injury.

The 2024 Chiefs outscored their opponents by 59 points, or roughly 3.5 points per game. And if we don't include the post-Mahomes games, the 2025 Chiefs outscored their opponents by 60 points, which is just under 4.3 points per game. Point differential suggests those teams should roughly expect to get about the same number of wins over a full season with an average amount of luck and timing.

To put that into context over 17 games, let's look at teams that outscored their opponents by a margin between three and five points per game in a season. Since 1990, 117 teams have fit into that window. The best record produced by any of those teams is 15-2, which matches the Chiefs' 2024 record. The Chiefs were 6-8 with Mahomes in the lineup, and that would have been a .428 winning percentage over a full season. That would be the worst winning percentage produced by any of those three-to-five-point-differential teams over a full campaign. In other words, the 2024 Chiefs got the best recorded results out of being a pretty good team since 1990, and the 2025 Chiefs -- even with Mahomes -- were getting the worst results of any team at that level in recent history before his injury.

Even if the Chiefs produce average results with that sort of point differential in 2026, they should be back in the postseason. Are there reasons to be concerned that they won't match up to that underlying level of play? Maybe. To start, Mahomes is returning from the torn ACL. Though the soon-to-be 31-year-old quarterback is still in contention to start the season on the active roster, it's difficult to imagine that he won't feel some sort of disruption or struggle coming back from his first significant injury as a pro. At the very least, Mahomes' legendary ability to scramble and extend plays might be limited early in 2026.

play
1:15
Why Mad Dog is expecting a big year out of Patrick Mahomes

The defense has also lost key players in the secondary, with Trent McDuffie dealt to the Rams, Jaylen Watson joining the Rams in free agency and starting safety Bryan Cook inking a deal with the Bengals. The Chiefs used a top-10 pick on cornerback Mansoor Delane and took shots on L'Jarius Sneed and Kader Kohou in free agency, but it's tough to imagine that the secondary will be as stout as it was during those runs to the Super Bowl.

On the other hand, the Chiefs have made meaningful upgrades elsewhere. Kenneth Walker III should offer a jolt of electricity to a run game that had grown timid and stale over the past couple of seasons, ranking last in explosive play rate. The front four is suddenly much deeper after the Chiefs signed Khyiris Tonga and used their top two picks on Peter Woods and R Mason Thomas. A full season from Josh Simmons, who was impressive at left tackle when available as a rookie, would be a massive upgrade at a spot that has topped out at average and often come up short over the past three years.

Amid stiff competition in the AFC West, the Chiefs won't get the sort of schedule relief that most teams receive by dropping from first to third in their division. The division drew a rough slate of out-of-division opponents in 2026, facing the AFC East and NFC West, ensuring that the Chiefs will get their annual regular-season encounter with the Bills and matchups against the Rams and Seahawks. The Chiefs' third-place game within the conference drew the Bengals. All four of those games are on the road. Their schedule is roughly league average, per ESPN's FPI.

I don't think there will be much pushback against the idea that the Chiefs will improve in 2026. How much they improve, though, might be the more meaningful discussion. And unless we see a dramatically different underlying level of play from this team, so much of that might come down to those one-score games and how things pan out in the final minutes of close contests. Winning half of such games would get the Chiefs back into the playoffs. And winning about 65% of the time -- which is Mahomes' new career rate in games decided by seven points or fewer -- might push Kansas City back atop the AFC West.


Detroit Lions

Record in 2025: 9-8 (2-5 in games decided by seven or fewer points)
Point differential in 2025: plus-68
Projected strength of schedule: Second easiest

Here's a second powerhouse that was on our list of teams likely to decline and fell further than anybody could have expected last season. The Lions dropped from 7-2 in one-score games in 2024 to 2-5 last season. Their story isn't quite as clear-cut as that of the Chiefs, but the issues with Dan Campbell's team in 2025 start there.

The losses were often dramatic and painful. The Lions went 0-for-5 on fourth down in a midseason game against the Eagles, turning six trips inside Philly territory into just nine points. What appeared to be a miraculous last-second win against the Steelers was overturned by an offensive pass interference penalty on Amon-Ra St. Brown. And though it wasn't a one-score game, the Lions failed to recover all five fumbles in a 23-10 loss to the Vikings, turning the ball over six times on a day when winning quarterback Max Brosmer produced 3 net passing yards.

Failing to fall on fumbles was a subtle problem for the Lions. They recovered just under 29% of the fumbles on offense and defense last season, which was the worst mark in the league and just the fifth time since 1990 that any team has failed to recover at least 30% of fumbles in a season.

If we expand that to a 35% rate to build a larger sample, those teams were snakebit for only a single season. Those same teams recovered 51.7% of fumbles in their games the following year. Their turnover margin improved by 14 takeaways per 17 games. And, as a result, they won an average of 1.9 more contests (again, per 17 games). The Lions should come up with loose footballs more often in 2026.

Unlike the Chiefs, the Lions really were ripped to shreds by injuries in 2025. Detroit was last in adjusted games lost on defense, where the only starters who suited up for all 17 games were Derrick Barnes, Jack Campbell, Aidan Hutchinson and DJ Reader. Two of those four full-season starters were first-team All-Pros -- which is a pretty good ratio. The offense was healthier, but even there, Detroit was roughly in the middle of the injury pack.

The Lions are already facing injury concerns this season. New center Cade Mays, who was brought in to replace the released Graham Glasgow, is out for eight to 10 weeks because of a wrist injury. Power back Isiah Pacheco was going to step in for David Montgomery, but he has been slowed by a knee injury.

The situation in the secondary is more ominous. Starting safeties Brian Branch and Kerby Joseph formed the league's best duo in 2024, but both suffered serious injuries in 2025, with Branch tearing an Achilles and Joseph dealing with a still-murky knee issue. Both are on the physically unable to perform list. And cornerback Terrion Arnold, who was projected to start in 2026, was released after being charged with armed robbery and kidnapping.

Without those three starters, the secondary looks to be one of the worst in the NFL. D.J. Reed is a solid starter, but the Lions will be relying on veteran players on team-friendly deals, such as Rock Ya-Sin, Chuck Clark, Christian Izien and Roger McCreary, to compete for meaningful snaps. They'll be trying to hold up behind a line that will be missing veteran Al-Quadin Muhammad, who racked up 11 sacks and 20 knockdowns in a career season before leaving on a one-year deal to join the Buccaneers.

The Lions don't have the veteran depth they enjoyed in 2023 and 2024, in part because their young stars have commanded more lucrative contracts. In 2023, the Lions still had Hutchinson, St. Brown, Campbell, Penei Sewell, Jameson Williams and Jahmyr Gibbs all on rookie deals. Their six young stars combined to make about $29 million per season on their contracts at that time, allowing general manager Brad Holmes to surround them with veterans, such as Montgomery, Alex Anzalone and Tracy Walker III in supporting roles.

Now, those same six players are on contracts that combine to average nearly $173 million per season. Though the Lions can use some restructures to reduce the impact on the salary cap, there's still a significantly larger cash outlay going to those players. Though they all deserve their big extensions, the Lions don't have the same resources to surround those players with veteran starters.

Montgomery and Anzalone left this offseason, and Muhammad, Taylor Decker, Glasgow and Amik Robertson are also no longer in Detroit. The Lions had to seek free agents who would sign for less. And though Holmes could sacrifice draft capital to supplement the active roster, the Lions desperately need those selections to surround their core with cost-controlled talent in the years to come.

play
1:25
Rapoport tells McAfee about the 'renewed focus' he has noticed with the Lions

Having expensive stars is a good problem, but it's one that could cap the Lions' ceiling as they try to get back to the top of the NFC. What should make life easier in 2026, though, is the conference's easiest schedule. Though the NFC North might be a slugfest, the Lions get four games against the NFC South, and that makes anyone's life easier. Everyone else in the division gets a game against a playoff team from the NFC West, but the Lions get to face the Cardinals. Detroit still has a handful of games against high-end competition such as the Bills and Packers, but per the FPI's projection, it gets six games against the eight worst teams in the league.

And, of course, the Lions don't have to do much to contend in the NFC. They still managed a winning record last season. Their margin for error is narrower given the lack of depth on the roster, and the injuries on offense and defense are already concerning, but the Lions should push their way back into the postseason after an unexpected year off.


New York Giants

Record in 2025: 4-13 (1-6 in games decided by seven or fewer points)
Point differential in 2025: minus-58
Projected strength of schedule: Eighth toughest

The Giants did not have Super Bowl aspirations heading into 2025. The goal was a competitive season in what looked to be a make-or-break year for Brian Daboll after the Giants went 3-14 in 2024. There were positive signs from their rookie class, but the Giants improved by only one game -- and even that required a two-game winning streak to finish the season.

I'd argue that the Giants quietly had a more competitive season, even if Daboll wasn't around to see the end of it. Yes, New York finished 4-13, but its Pythagorean expectation suggests that Big Blue performed at a 7.1 win rate. Accounting for the 17-game schedule, the Giants are one of only 13 teams since 1990 to finish three-plus wins short of their expected win total by point differential, joining last season's Chiefs on that list.

Even if we expand the sample to include teams with a 2½-win gap, we're still looking at just 23 teams between 1990 and 2025. Those teams improved by an average of three wins per 17 games the following season. Teams that underperform their point differential typically play up to that level with another shot the following year.

Coming up short of the point differential also usually comes with a subpar record in one-score games, and the Giants were 1-6 in those contests a year ago, with their lone victory coming against the Chargers in Week 4. Some games can appear closer than reality, with a late score in garbage time bringing a losing team within one touchdown. But the 2025 Giants suffered some painful losses against winning teams in contests they had a real shot at winning:

  • In Week 2, the Giants' defense blew a 34-30 lead to the Cowboys with 52 seconds left, only for Russell Wilson to hit Malik Nabers for a 48-yard score to take a 37-34 lead back with 25 seconds to go. The Cowboys picked up 21 yards and set up Brandon Aubrey for a 64-yard field goal to tie the score, then won with four seconds remaining in overtime on another Aubrey kick.

  • Five weeks later, the Giants were up 26-8 on the Broncos with 10:08 left in the fourth quarter, but Bo Nix and Denver stormed back and scored three touchdowns in five minutes. A Jaxson Dart touchdown run gave the Giants a 32-30 lead with 37 seconds to go, but backup kicker Jude McAtamney missed the extra point attempt, and Nix hit 29- and 22-yard completions to set up a winning field goal for the Broncos.

  • In Week 10, the Giants kicked a field goal on fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard line to go up 20-10 on the Bears with 10:21 left, turning down a penalty for too many men on the field that would have brought the ball even closer to the goal line. The Bears scored a touchdown to get within one score, and after a 27-yard punt by Jamie Gillan, they took over at midfield and scored another to take a 24-20 lead inside the two-minute warning.

  • The following week, a Jameis Winston plunge put the Giants up 21-20 with 7:22 to go against the Packers. Green Bay scored on the ensuing drive to make it 27-21, and though Winston got the Giants in the red zone on the ensuing possession, an interception with 44 seconds remaining essentially ended the contest.

  • Want another fourth-quarter blown lead? The Giants led the Lions 27-17 with 12:16 to go after Winston threw a touchdown pass to Gunner Olszewski. Jahmyr Gibbs ran for a 49-yard touchdown that pulled the Lions within three, and after the Giants failed to score despite having the ball on second-and-goal at the Detroit 2-yard line, a 59-yard field goal by Jake Bates sent the game to overtime. Gibbs scored from 69 yards on the opening play from scrimmage in OT, and the ensuing Giants drive sputtered out.

  • Finally, Ben Sauls -- the team's fourth kicker of the season -- hit a 39-yard field goal to tie the score at 13-13 against the Vikings with 11:06 left. A near-six-minute drive from the Vikings produced a short field goal to take the lead, and Dart's attempt to answer faded at midfield, allowing Max Brosmer to kneel out the clock.

That's six losses that could have gone the other way against teams with winning records. The Giants held fourth-quarter leads in five of the six -- and final-minute leads in three. They lost four games where they held a win probability of at least 90% in the fourth quarter. The rest of the league lost just 15 such games combined. The Giants are just the fourth team to lose four of those games in a season, joining the 2013 Buccaneers, 2009 Steelers and ... 2015 Giants, who also got their head coach fired (or forced out), with Tom Coughlin's tenure ending.

That 2016 Giants team promoted Ben McAdoo to head coach, invested heavily in free agents and jumped from 6-10 to 11-5 despite not dramatically improving its underlying level of play; the Giants went from being outscored by 1.4 points per game to outscoring teams by 1.6 points per contest. They followed a 3-8 season in one-score games by going 8-3 in them, and though the improvement (and McAdoo) didn't stick in the years that followed, that 11-5 season was the best record the Giants have produced since 2008. The Giants hope that John Harbaugh will offer much-needed stability for a franchise that made the longtime Ravens coach its fifth head coaching hire in 10 years after Coughlin's tenure.

The offense is the source of a high ceiling and a low floor. Giants fans are understandably enthused about a core built around Dart, Nabers, running back Cam Skattebo and high-end left tackle Andrew Thomas. The promise of all four on the field at the same time hints at a step forward for an offense that has finished 30th or worse in scoring four times over the past six years.

The problem, of course, is counting on them to all be present at the same time. They were on the field for just 60 snaps last season. Skattebo (ankle), Nabers (knee) and Thomas (hamstring) finished the year on injured reserve, while Dart missed time because of a concussion and was repeatedly pulled out of games over concerns about his health. If they're all healthy and live up to expectations, the Giants could take a massive leap forward on offense, which ranked 22nd in 2025. If not, the Giants might not have the depth to deal with absences, especially after they lost several free agents to Daboll's new employers in Tennessee.

The defense also underwent substantial changes after finishing 26th in DVOA. Dexter Lawrence II, a cornerstone at defensive tackle, was traded to the Bengals for the 10th pick. Free agent disappointment Bobby Okereke was cut and replaced by Tremaine Edmunds, who endured a similar fate with the Bears. Giants general manager Joe Schoen let cornerback Cor'Dale Flott leave in free agency and replaced him with Greg Newsome II, who struggled with the Browns and Jags last season. And the Giants used their No. 5 pick on hybrid Ohio State defender Arvell Reese, giving them yet another potentially impactful edge rusher to play alongside Brian Burns, Abdul Carter and Kayvon Thibodeaux.

Stopping the run was the big problem for the Giants in 2025, when they finished last in yards per carry (5.4), and 31st in explosive play rate (10.9%) and success rate (51.7%) against designed runs, coming within a few steps of winning the bad run defense triple crown. Losing Micah McFadden to a Week 1 injury didn't help, but it's tough to believe that getting him back will single-handedly fix what's wrong on the ground for New York, especially with Lawrence now in Cincinnati. The massive tackle wasn't his usual self last season, when he played through an elbow injury, but the Giants had significant problems stopping the run and tackling at all three levels.

Dennard Wilson's defense will be tested to begin the campaign, as the Giants start their season against the Cowboys and Rams before the schedule briefly softens. Over the full season, the Giants project to face the league's eighth-toughest schedule by the FPI's algorithm, which could dampen their chances of making it to the postseason. I believe they have a legitimate shot at surprising the league and becoming a last-place team that jumps into the playoffs in 2026, but so much will depend on whether the offensive standouts stay healthy for much (or all) of the year.


New York Jets

Record in 2025: 3-14 (3-5 in games decided by seven or fewer points)
Point differential in 2025: minus-203
Projected strength of schedule: Sixth easiest

Let's stick around in North Jersey, where the 2025 Jets did something that nobody in NFL history had managed before. Despite hiring former starting cornerback Aaron Glenn as the team's head coach, the Jets simply could not catch the football on defense. They went all season without even a single interception, the first time that has ever happened. The Jets went 0-for-503.

As if that wasn't enough, the Jets were also unlucky in terms of recovering fumbles, ranking 31st behind the aforementioned Lions by grabbing just 35% of loose balls in their games. On defense, the Jets recovered four of the 14 fumbles they forced. In total, those four turnovers the Jets forced are the fewest for any team since 1934, when the St. Louis Cardinals forced four takeaways all season. Of course, they also played only three games ...

With the offense struggling, the Jets finished with a turnover margin of minus-19. The Commanders were the only other team to finish with a double-digit negative turnover margin, and they came in at minus-13. The Jets were on a disastrous island.

Whether it's a renewed emphasis on recovering the football, improvements on the personnel side or sheer randomness, history shows that the vast majority of teams in this window improve their turnover margin and their win-loss record the following season. Adjusting for the 17-game season, there have been 34 teams since 1990 to finish with a turnover margin between minus-22 and minus-16 in a given season. The following year, their turnover margin improved by an average of nearly 20 turnovers. Those teams finished with an average turnover margin of plus-1.3. And unsurprisingly, they got much better in the process. They won an average of 2.8 more games the following season. The most recent example would be the 2022 Jaguars, who recovered from the Urban Meyer fiasco in 2021 to go 9-8 and win the division.

The Jets winning the AFC East would be a remarkable surprise, and I'm not projecting their season to land there, but it's worth noting that they've made massive roster upgrades this offseason. By the time they lost 42-10 to the Patriots in Week 17, the Jets had already traded star defenders Quinnen Williams and Sauce Gardner for multiple first-round picks. Their quarterback was Brady Cook. His leading receiver on the day was John Metchie III. The secondary was playing multiple rookies for significant snaps. The Jets weren't tanking, but they weren't exactly expecting to win, either.

They began to use those picks this offseason, with four first- or second-round picks joining the roster. They made significant, much-needed investments on the defensive side of the ball, signing Demario Davis at linebacker, acquiring Minkah Fitzpatrick at safety and replenishing the team's defensive line. T'Vondre Sweat gave the Jets an underrated nose tackle, while Will McDonald IV is now joined by Joseph Ossai, Kingsley Enagbare and second overall pick David Bailey on the edge.

I'm also still (cautiously) holding out hope that Geno Smith -- another one of those offseason additions -- can hold up his end of the bargain under center. The Raiders were a schematic and personnel mess on offense last season. They saw only glimpses of Brock Bowers while he dealt with injuries all season. Left tackle Kolton Miller, the team's best lineman, was done by Week 4. Jakobi Meyers was dealt away at midseason. In all, we got one game of Smith with a viable top receiver and a starting-caliber left tackle, and in that game, he went 24-of-34 for 362 yards, a touchdown and an interception (Week 1 win over the Patriots). He never came close to those numbers the rest of the way.

And if the surrounding talent was what held Smith back, well, the Jets actually have plenty to work with this season. I placed the Jets 12th in my offensive playmaker rankings, with Garrett Wilson and Breece Hall now supported by a pair of first-round picks in receiver Omar Cooper Jr. and tight end Kenyon Sadiq. Smith has two young, promising tackles in Olu Fashanu and Armand Membou. There's real help here. (Hall is dealing with a strained groin but is expected back for Week 1.)

They need to make a difference in the red zone, though. The Jets scored just 4.2 points per red zone trip in 2025, which was the worst mark in the NFL. Meanwhile, Glenn's defense allowed 5.5 points when offenses were inside the 20, a figure that was trailed by only the Cowboys. While Dallas could at least call on an explosive offense, the Jets dealt with a minus-1.3 point disparity on trips to the end zone by their offense and defense.

As you might guess, that was the worst mark in the league. And as you might already be inferring, it doesn't tend to stick. Going back to 2001 now because of data limitations, 44 teams have seen their red zone defense trail their red zone offense by at least one point per possession in a given season. The following year? Those teams restored much of that differential, with the gap falling to minus-0.2 points. Their collective records improved by an average of 2.5 wins per 17 games.

This was the worst team in the NFL a year ago by advanced metrics, so setting expectations appropriately is important. It would be truly stunning to see the Jets fly up the AFC charts and compete for a playoff berth, let alone land one. They seem more likely to jump up to five or six wins in 2026, but even that would represent significant improvement.


Baltimore Ravens

Record in 2025: 8-9 (1-4 in games decided by seven or fewer points)
Point differential in 2025: plus-26
Projected strength of schedule: Fifth easiest

We finish up with a Super Bowl contender that saw its season go wrong in the most frustrating fashion. The Ravens started 1-5, hit their bye, won their next five games and made it to Week 18 with a chance to beat the Steelers and win the AFC North. That game saw the teams trade two touchdowns in the fourth quarter, but after Lamar Jackson drove the Ravens into position for a 44-yard field goal, Tyler Loop missed a kick that would have won both the game and the division for Baltimore. John Harbaugh was fired after the game, ending his 18-year tenure with the organization.

Let's run through the biggest reasons the Ravens disappointed in 2025 and put them into context for what might lead them to improve in 2026.

Jackson was sidelined by a hamstring injury. After healthy and dominant seasons in 2023 and 2024, the two-time MVP wasn't the same in 2025. Jackson was off to a great start, posting a 74.8 QBR across his first four starts (fourth in the league), but a hamstring injury sidelined him for a month.

While Jackson threw four touchdown passes in a return win over the Dolphins, he didn't look like his usual self over the next month, throwing one touchdown against four picks in the four ensuing contests. And while things settled down over the final three games of the season, Jackson didn't do much as a passer in those contests, attempting just 12, 10 and 18 passes, respectively, against the Bengals, Patriots and Steelers. (He missed a game against the Packers with a back contusion in there, too.)

We've seen Jackson injuries derail the Ravens before, with the future Hall of Famer missing the end of both the 2021 and 2022 campaigns. When Jackson has played, though, he has typically been dominant. In fact, 2025 was the first regular season in which Jackson wasn't blowing away the competition over any sort of extended stretch of time. It's reasonable to chalk that up to the aftereffects of the hamstring injury, but it's at least a little concerning.

The Ravens also reduced Jackson's workload as a runner. Between 2020 and 2024, Jackson averaged 5.5 designed runs per game, a number which doesn't include scrambles or kneel-downs. In 2025, that dropped to two designed runs per game. It could drop even further in 2026 as the Ravens move Jackson under center more often under new offensive coordinator Declan Doyle, which will limit Baltimore's ability to run the sort of read concepts that Jackson has excelled in during his career.

On the other hand, fewer designed runs might also keep Jackson from getting hit quite as often, which should make it easier for him to play a full season. Jackson is a wizard at getting out of bounds or avoiding big hits at the end of scrambles, but that's tougher on designed runs between the tackles. That trade-off is probably a plus for the Ravens if Jackson actually completes the entire season on the field.

The defense collapsed. Again. For the second year in a row, the Ravens struggled with a disastrous performance on defense before correcting things as the season went along. Through their first five games, the Ravens were dead last in points allowed per drive (3.2) and 30th in EPA allowed per play (plus-0.15). Things got a little bit better against the Rams in Week 6, but improvement really only came after their bye, at which point the Ravens jumped to eighth in both points allowed per possession and EPA allowed per play.

Health was an issue early in the season at different positions, but the Ravens didn't have star defensive tackle Nnamdi Madubuike for the entirety of that post-bye run after the lineman suffered a season-ending neck injury in September. (They finished as the third-most-injured defense in the league by adjusted games lost, although they were also its fourth-healthiest offense.) And some of the shift was extremely variance-driven, as the Ravens were the league's fourth-worst red zone defense before the bye and its best afterward.

The reality, though, is that the Ravens' pass rush simply wasn't good enough. After ranking fourth in sack rate and eighth in pressure rate during Mike Macdonald's final year as defensive coordinator in 2023, the Ravens were 23rd in sack rate and 27th in pressure rate between 2024 and 2025. The organization gave up on Odafe Oweh, trading him to the Chargers for rental safety Alohi Gilman, and it didn't get much out of rookie second-rounder Mike Green, who had 3.5 sacks on 712 snaps in his debut season.

Much of GM Eric DeCosta's offseason was built around fixing those issues. He famously tried to trade two first-round picks for Maxx Crosby before backing out of the deal and signing edge rusher Trey Hendrickson in free agency. Baltimore also signed ageless wonder Calais Campbell for interior help and threw another second-round pick at the problem in Zion Young.

The most important addition might be new coach Jesse Minter, who was Macdonald's successor as the defensive coordinator at Michigan. Former coordinator Zach Orr never really seemed to have a reliable handle on what was going wrong in Baltimore, and while the Ravens righted the ship by the end of 2024, things were a mess again early in 2025.

play
1:47
Why Louis Riddick still has faith in Derrick Henry

Minter worked wonders with the Chargers, getting more out of cornerbacks such as Tarheeb Still, Benjamin St-Juste and Donte Jackson than anyone could have expected. He revitalized the career of Derwin James Jr., which bodes well for star Ravens safety Kyle Hamilton, who is already playing at a high level. Minter also coaxed a great half-season out of Oweh, and if the Ravens can similarly manipulate protections and use exotic pressures to create one-on-ones and unblocked rushers, it'll get the pass rush back on track. I'm optimistic.

Bad luck in close games. The Ravens were 1-4 in one-score games, and I just mentioned how the Steelers game came down to a field goal. In Week 1, the Ravens lost to the Bills despite leading 40-25 with the ball and eight minutes to go, owing in part to a crucial Derrick Henry fumble. Another Henry fumble cost the Ravens two weeks later, handing the Lions a short field in the fourth quarter of a game that Baltimore would eventually lose 38-30. Three fourth-quarter trips into the red zone produced only six points in a 27-22 loss to the Steelers. None of these losses represent bad luck, but they're games the Ravens often found a way to pull out during the Jackson era. (He was 26-20 in one-score games as a starter before 2025.)

Life will be easier in 2026. The Ravens project to face the league's fifth-easiest schedule, as their season begins with five of the first six contests against teams that the FPI expects to post losing records in the Colts, Saints, Titans, Falcons and Browns. Things get much more difficult from that point forward, but if the Ravens do get off to their now-habitual slow start on defense, they should still be able to pull out some victories against overmatched competition.

Their ceiling might depend on whether their expensive core of veteran talent -- Jackson, Hendrickson, Madubuike, Roquan Smith, Ronnie Stanley, Marlon Humphrey and Zay Flowers -- can stay on the field for the vast majority of the campaign. As long as everyone is available for most of the year, the Ravens should be back on track to compete at the top of the AFC in 2026.