Central Arkansas Bears @ Alabama A&M Bulldogs
8-5, 4-4 Away
65
8-5, 4-4 Away
Final
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARK | 17 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 65 |
AAMU | 15 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 59 |
5-7, 4-1 Home
59
5-7, 4-1 Home
Central Arkansas Bears
starters |
bench |
team |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
| 28 | 10 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 20 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 25 | 7 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 32 | 11 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 |
| 27 | 5 | 2-10 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
| 16 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| 8 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 10 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 8 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 20 | 7-12 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
65 | 27-60 | 3-15 | 8-10 | 37 | 8 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 29 | 14 | |
45% | 20% | 80% |
Alabama A&M Bulldogs
starters |
bench |
team |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
| 27 | 8 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| 19 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 4 | 2-15 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| 32 | 22 | 7-15 | 2-3 | 6-6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| 35 | 6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | OREB | DREB | PF |
| 13 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 12 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 26 | 9 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
59 | 20-63 | 2-8 | 17-18 | 41 | 11 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 15 | 26 | 12 | |
32% | 25% | 94% |
Game Information
Huntsville, AL
2025-26 Standings
NCAA Division I
| Atlantic Sun Conference | CONF | GB | OVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Kentucky | 15-3 | - | 25-9 |
| Jacksonville | 13-5 | 2 | 24-9 |
| Central Arkansas | 13-5 | 2 | 21-11 |
| Stetson | 12-6 | 3 | 20-12 |
| North Alabama | 11-7 | 4 | 17-14 |
| Florida Gulf Coast | 11-7 | 4 | 16-16 |
| West Georgia | 10-8 | 5 | 18-13 |
| Austin Peay | 8-10 | 7 | 19-14 |
| Lipscomb | 7-11 | 8 | 10-20 |
| Queens University | 4-14 | 11 | 10-20 |
| North Florida | 4-14 | 11 | 9-21 |
| Bellarmine | 0-18 | 15 | 2-30 |
| Southwestern Athletic Conference | CONF | GB | OVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama A&M | 17-1 | - | 22-11 |
| Alcorn State | 14-4 | 3 | 17-14 |
| Southern | 12-6 | 5 | 20-14 |
| Alabama State | 12-6 | 5 | 17-15 |
| Arkansas-Pine Bluff | 10-8 | 7 | 15-16 |
| Grambling | 10-8 | 7 | 13-19 |
| Jackson State | 10-8 | 7 | 12-19 |
| Florida A&M | 7-11 | 10 | 9-22 |
| Texas Southern | 6-12 | 11 | 10-21 |
| Mississippi Valley State | 6-12 | 11 | 8-23 |
| Bethune-Cookman | 4-14 | 13 | 7-26 |
| Prairie View A&M | 0-18 | 17 | 2-28 |
Women's College Basketball News
Suit alleges new NCAA rule unfair to high school Class of 2022
Less than 24 hours after the NCAA Division I Cabinet approved a monumental change in eligibility rules, a group of 15 college basketball players filed a lawsuit claiming the new age-based model unfairly shuts them out of further competition.
5h
NCAA Division I Cabinet OK's 5-year, age-based eligibility
The NCAA Division I Cabinet unanimously approved a new five-year, age-based eligibility model. This marks a win for the NCAA as it attempts to bring consistency to the landscape.
1d
Virginia Tech names Brian White athletic director
Florida Atlantic athletic director Brian White has emerged as the target in Virginia Tech's AD search and a deal is expected to come together in the near future, sources told ESPN's Pete Thamel on Monday.
2d