This story appears in ESPN The Magazine's Oct. 17 Great Debates Issue. Subscribe today!
THERE IS MORE than just a debate point here for female athletes; there is a double standard.
When Ronda Rousey wouldn't touch gloves with Holly Holm before their fight last November, people absolutely crushed her for it, even though male UFC fighters -- Dominick Cruz, Anderson Silva, Nate Diaz, Conor McGregor (to name just a few) -- don't always touch gloves. In Rio, Gabby Douglas appeared disappointed (gasp!) that she narrowly missed the chance to defend her gymnastics all-around title. Social media critics came down on her hard for showing her desire to compete, an athletic virtue that's as revered as the Games themselves.
With this as a baseline, when someone is as outspoken as Hope Solo -- who was taken to task for her blunt criticisms well before her recent legal trouble -- it stands out.
The dilemma female athletes face is that those who stay in the safe, wholesome lane are labeled "boring" and cited as a reason women's sports aren't as popular as men's. So how can a female athlete be compelling without also being viewed as controversial?
I emailed a group of phenomenal female athletes -- and one legendary women's coach -- to pose those questions. Here is an edited version of our reply-all thread.
ROUNDTABLE PARTICIPANTS
Ramona Shelburne
ESPN senior writer and former Stanford softball player
Geno Auriemma
UConn women's basketball coach
Lashinda Demus
2012 Olympic silver medalist in the 400-meter hurdles
Stacey Nuveman Deniz
Olympic softball player
Julie Foudy
U.S. soccer legend and ESPN commentator
Natasha Watley
Olympic softball player
Cat Zingano
UFC bantamweight fighter
RAMONA SHELBURNE: Why can't women just own their feelings and be competitive? Why can't we be pissed off or visibly disappointed when we lose or don't see our name in the lineup?
JULIE FOUDY: Some of it is the expectation -- "That is what a nice girl does" -- but I also think we women are still hesitant to own our awesome. It isn't literally wearing an "I Am Awesome" T-shirt or walking around saying how awesome you are. There is hubris and there is confidence. No one likes, in any gender, overconfident a--holes. We women, present company included, are terrible at owning our awesomeness. I feel like into my 40s I am finally just getting there.
STACEY NUVEMAN DENIZ: I'm not sure the concept or expectation of successful females -- athletes, politicians or any woman in a public space -- is to be nice. I think the expectation is to be humble. Humility might be the most revered quality of any female with any amount of accomplishment. I think back to the times I was complimented for being humble and the pride I felt for being characterized that way. I was an accomplished athlete, and downplaying my success -- the polar opposite of "owning my awesome" -- was my greatest attribute.
NATASHA WATLEY: I can remember losing in the gold medal game [to Japan] at the 2008 Olympics, returning home and having everyone say, "You should be proud of your silver medal, not many people get to compete in the Olympics." I get it. What else could they say? But I really wanted to say, "F you! We didn't prepare for endless months to 'win' a silver medal." It's like as a female athlete it's not supposed to be in our nature to be pissed at losing.
LaSHINDA DEMUS: I'm extremely competitive but never show it. I've been constantly told that I need to try to focus on hitting a certain demographic of women, not men. But most of these women I was told to try to reach actually cared nothing about my athletic capabilities because they can't connect with that, according to both male and female public relations specialists that I spoke with.
SHELBURNE: Is it even possible for a female athlete to be real, bold and interesting without being cast in a negative light? Or is going negative still the only way to get attention?
FOUDY: I've heard people say women's sports needs more antiheroes. I couldn't disagree more. We don't need more antiheroes; we need more women to be the big personalities that live inside them. We need more people promoting those personalities. We don't need more domestic violence incidents, more drunken driving incidents, more negativity. We need women who are willing to be big and bold and show us how being a great teammate/player is indeed newsworthy.
GENO AURIEMMA: Why should female athletes be held to the standard that male athletes have set? In order to be compelling, you have to throw a tantrum, commit assault, carry a weapon or get suspended for drug use? Is Tom Brady not compelling? Tim Duncan? Mike Trout? Why do you think the NFL is cracking down on idiotic behavior? It's because it doesn't sell anymore. Why can't women just be great athletes? Leave it at that.
CAT ZINGANO: I am constantly being told about the lack of "hype" I create, although I am one of the most entertaining female fighters to date. There are educated and die-hard fans who love and support the evolution of the sport for women. But it seems that you must also have a story, sex appeal and the ability to stir up drama to retain fans and be paid [well].
I was recently told to use my "strong points": that I am a single mom, that I have a "story," that I can clean up and have sex appeal. I would rather wear sweatpants and throw my hair in a knot! But in order to further my career, I need to work harder, not at my craft but at promoting myself outside of the Octagon. I just want to work hard at my sport. I want my personal achievement and work ethic to speak for me.
DEMUS: Competing professionally, especially in a sport that gets glamorized every four years, is difficult. You have a few angles to take as a female track athlete to actually make a living from it. You can be the prettiest little thing out there with not so much talent as the next athlete in hopes of getting the attention of sponsorships, or you can be the "Mother Teresa" athlete who is politically correct along with a nearly perfect career. Ever since I was a little girl, my goal was to be the best. That's it. It was not until I became professional that I was told I should focus on my branding and how I appeal to the public.
SHELBURNE: Nuvey, you are so funny; people told me they peed their pants during your banquet speech at a Women's College World Series. Do you ever let that humor rip publicly? Did you have the right forum to do so, before social media was so pervasive? I think if you asked most people who they remember from those U.S. Olympic softball teams, it would be Jennie Finch, who was a great pitcher but also indisputably got attention for her beauty. Do you think that would be the same today?
NUVEMAN DENIZ: Women's team sports, softball in particular, have a pretty clearly defined audience: families. Softball goes after the daddy-daughter market, and as such, the more wholesome and family-friendly the personality, the better. Jennie shined in the spotlight, with style and grace, and I'm proud of how she handled it. Soccer has been the same, historically. The women who were front and center for USA softball and USA soccer during my tenure were phenomenal athletes but also "safe" personalities who embraced being a role model and did little to tarnish that responsibility.
For me personally, I was a Row 2 athlete from a marketing and publicity standpoint: I wasn't front and center, but I wasn't back row either. I didn't have many opportunities to let my humor rip, but when I did, I held back some. I tried to be charming but safe.
WATLEY: It's amazing what people focus on. Although Jennie herself is extremely humble (I adore her!), it was completely out of her control how much attention she got for her beauty when she had so many amazing accolades on the field. I'm with Coach Auriemma: When will women be praised for just being phenomenal athletes?
AURIEMMA: I still contend that we in the women's game should not aspire to "be like the men." We should work really hard to keep pointing out why our behavior is more acceptable and long-term more appealing to the next generation of fans.
SHELBURNE: Speaking of the next generation, if we reconvene this panel in five or 10 years, what will be different?
DEMUS: At times I think things are going backward. Sponsors are showing that less attention is being put into athletic abilities and more into backstories and drama, so women are continuing to find a happy medium between being their true competitive self and who the public wants them to be.
I wrote a blog awhile back about when Drake hosted the ESPYS. It was a bit they did with Skylar Diggins and Drake and his love for her being "beautiful." Nothing was mentioned about her abilities.
I've seen a glimmer of hope in boxing and mixed martial arts. It seems to be accepted by the masses better, so they're doing something right over there. One thing that men love and find appealing is aggression. I believe that if women bring that to sports, with women showing their true competitiveness, it will pull in more male viewers.
FOUDY: I can tell you what won't be different in five to 10 years' time: how much attention is paid to external beauty rather than talent. As much as we find that annoying, it's the reality of society, and sadly it's not going away. Sure, it also exists on the men's side with a David Beckham or Tom Brady type, but those men don't need looks to be popular, get sponsors and drive page views. It simply enhances the revenue on the men's side, where most women depend on it.
What will be different in five to 10 years is the level of support around women's sports from more women being at all levels of media. We need people, women and men, who wake up every single day and their priority every single day is to help grow the women's game. Yes, every single day.
NUVEMAN DENIZ: The prospect of a woman in the White House could go a long way to shifting this paradigm. If cultural norms are to be challenged, men and women need to experience females in positions of power and watch them kick ass.
The pressures will be tremendous to do it "right" and do it well for these women, and they will face obstacles and unfair standards and criticisms and resistance, but that's how it goes. Look at any progressive concept in our country's history and the road map is there for us to see. But the day-to-day, relentless pursuit is how change will happen.
ZINGANO: Ronda Rousey was a huge advocate for women in the UFC, and I'm grateful to her for many reasons. She makes very good money, but she sacrificed herself to better our opportunities as female fighters trying to capitalize on the highest platform.
She also exudes the "f--- it, f--- off, f--- them, f--- you, f--- me" mentality we all know we think. Yes, some people hate her for it, but it's good for women to gauge themselves on, to say, "OK, she took that a little far, but she has a point, this taboo topic does need to be addressed."
I want the freedom to push the limits of what's been achieved in my sport and raise the bar while doing things differently. If I fail while trying to do things differently, oh well. If I succeed at doing things differently?
Hell yes.
